Google Instant Indexing

I heard an interesting quote from Sergey Brin today during the Google Press conference for their Google Instant search innovation. I included Brin’s quote – “We want to make Google the third half of your brain” in a blog post and  shortly after publishing it searched Google to see how many news sites had picked up the same quote. To my surprise, my blog post along with posts from the Wall Street Journal and CNET was indexed almost simultaneously upon publication. Instant Indexing The same can not be said about my blog posts in Yahoo / Bing search results. Yahoo Indefinite Indexing Yahoo / Bing’s “8″ results came a full hour after posting to my blog, while Google’s 173 results were available at the time of my initial post. If in search size does matter, Bing search still obviously has its work cut out for it.

9c31c9fa46dexing.png 150x89 Google Instant Indexing

Read more here:
Google Instant Indexing

Three Lively Blogging Debates to Explore in 2010

Sometimes it seems like we’re running out of juicy debates in the blogosphere. We used to have endless back and forth conversations about a few pet topics. Long posts versus short. How-to posts versus introspection. Professionalism versus authenticity. Ginger versus Mary Ann . We never had a debate about bullet points , mind you. Everyone knows bullet points are good. As those debates quiet down, some truths are coming to light. We know that content is still (yes, even after it’s been said so often it’s become a cliché) king. We know that there isn’t a single “right” way to blog. We know that no matter how sick you are of list posts , they are going to keep working forever. That doesn’t mean the debates are over, of course. We’ve just moved on to more subtle topics. People will always like to take sides on what we’re doing right and what we’re doing wrong. We like to think about what’s ethical, what’s proper, what’s good, what’s professional. So here are some interesting up-and-coming debates I see rising up around blogging: 1. Should blogs remain free? When a blog is born, it makes sense that it’s free. No one knows if the content is any good yet. It’s a bit like giving away free consultations if you’re just starting out as a consultant. You get experience, your subject gets a free consult, and gradually you develop enough expertise to command a reasonable price for your services. So far, we haven’t seen that evolution happen with blogs. They get stuck on “free,” no matter how elite or expert their content. The debate is whether that’s a good thing or a bad thing. Maybe blogs are best used the way they mostly are today, as one of the best marketing strategies out there. After all, they cost practically nothing, and they can generate a huge audience for whatever you’re selling. Or maybe bloggers are getting hosed. Or maybe it depends on what kind of blog you have. That’s all part of the debate. 2. Is it okay to hire a ghostwriter for a non-corporate blog? Many companies hire out blogging to professionals. They see blogging as a way to generate credibility, rather than a way to create personal relationships with their readers. They’re hoping for search engine traffic and impressed potential buyers, not pals. (There’s a sub-debate in there for you — would companies be better served by becoming pals with their customers?) This means that companies don’t think twice about outsourcing their blog content. They treat their blog as just more web copy. I’ve talked to a few individual bloggers, though, who find the practice of ghostwriting abhorrent. To them, blogging is all about creating a personal relationship. If the name at the top of the post is the CEO of the company, they become very upset when they find out the post was really written by a copywriter. This is an interesting debate, and it’s one that’s only just starting to make its presence heard. Should bloggers be like newspaper columnists, with a byline at the top of each post? In that scenario, companies could get a big credibility boost from being able to hire and keep a prestigious name. Or is writing a blog just another kind of copywriting? One that doesn’t need a byline any more than a brochure or sales letter does? 3. Should your identity remain private? Everyone has had to suffer the troll . The guy who shows up, leaves a nasty anonymous comment, and then goes scampering away again. We all know these guys are cowards. Most of them would never say such a thing if they actually had to face you on the street. So should we make sure they have to show their faces? There’s some talk about creating online identities so that you’ll always be able to tell who’s commenting. We’re probably not talking about giving out their home address, but at least their name, maybe their website. Now this might seem like a pretty good idea, especially if you’ve recently been flamed by some anonymous yahoo. But it may not be so simple. Would you want every comment you make on a political website to be traced back to you? Every comment about a sensitive topic? Every pointed remark about your mother-in-law? Even if each of those comments is polite and reasonable, you may not want everyone in your neighborhood knowing you made them. These aren’t the only debates out there. But I think they’re more interesting than whether or not we should use action words in our headlines. (We should. That debate’s over. Next subject.) What are the debates you’ve noticed happening around blogging? And what are your opinions on the ones I’ve mentioned here? About the Author: James Chartrand is the copywriter who’s not afraid to embrace a good debate. Check out Men with Pens for more tips, tricks and techniques on how to write better blog posts, or better yet, sign up for the Men with Pens RSS feed right here .

d1e143b24bdebate.jpg 100x150 Three Lively Blogging Debates to Explore in 2010

See original here:
Three Lively Blogging Debates to Explore in 2010

Establishing A Brand Image Online

I thought the following article from Mahesh Murthy via The Wall Street Journal was instructive: One thing I learned from my days in traditional advertising is that a brand doesn’t exist on shelves—it exists in the hearts and minds of people. Your brand is the sum total of perceptions about your product in the heads of your relevant audience. If that’s true, then online media are the most important place for your brand image to be established, defended and grown. This is where your offering comes face-to-face with your audience and where its responses can be measured, shaped and—if need be—countered in real time. This is where perceptions can be built, person by person. This brand building is more effective that the mode we’ve employed until now: TV commercials with 30 seconds of well-produced fiction that try to sell a brand image. It is more credible and much less expensive. In fact, it can cost you nothing, if you have the knack and can do it right. Not too many TV campaigns can match that. Zero-budget advertising is a phrase no traditional advertising firm wants to hear. The old ad business is predicated on your spending lots of money buying space and time in media vehicles such as this one. But if you look at recent times, it’s a model that is dying. Look at some of the world’s biggest brands. Gooogle, Amazon, Ferrari, Starbucks, Ikea, eBay, Yahoo, Apple, Harley Davidson, Reuters and Goldman Sachs are a dozen among the 100 top brands in the world per a recent study by brand management firm Interbrand, each with a “brand value” that averages $10 billion. Word of mouth played a major role in building those brands. We await the Apple iPad with no ads released yet, we talk of Google Buzz without having ever seen a Google ad, and we throng to a Zara outlet without seeing its commercials on TV. Today, the best way to establish your brand among big-hitter rivals is to make it remark-worthy and generate conversations free of charge. See how Red Bull took on big-ad-buying Coke and Pepsi with a product that sold at a higher price for a smaller pack size and built it to a billion-dollar brand with little advertising? The new axiom, call it Mahesh’s Law, is this: your marketing IQ is inversely proportional to your marketing budget. Start on your brand by answering a simple question: Are you remark-worthy? When someone talks about your offering, is there a 10-second sound bite that is “re-tweetable” on Twitter? If not, go back to basics and craft a simple, clear hook that that sets you apart. Like: Google helps you find stuff better, Harley owners are a cult, Starbucks is a great place to be, Red Bull lets you party harder. Now apply a single test: Do a Google search on your brand to see whether every element of the resulting page can support this position. Among the results will be your Web site, news items about you, other Web users who mention you, blogs about you, tweets about you, videos starring you and such. Now work to own the presence in each of these elements. Start with the Web site. If it’s got corporate gobbledygook and you don’t go back a second time, users won’t either. Make it something worth talking about and worth returning to. Find a Web firm that understands your brand, and not a tech firm. Or do it yourself if you’re starting out. Then audit every mention of you. Google alerts alone won’t do it, but it’s a start. See who’s saying what. Then intervene in conversations and respond to complaints, visibly, with your own Twitter account or some other way of interacting. It’s important that on-lookers see your response to a complaint in the open so they know that you can take care of theirs too, if they ever have one. This is where your real brand is built. Are you seen as the one to talk to in your industry? What will make it so? Issue white papers or surveys, or give out fun statistics. Do the things regularly that give you thought leadership in your niche. Are there fun or educational videos you’re part of? Put them up, even if they’re shot on your phone. Are there competitors being talked about? Intervene, and respectfully make your presence felt. Journalists today take more stories from what’s blogged and tweeted about than they take from publicists. Connect with them directly. They’ll respect you for it. Become a “source.” You’re not burdened with the necessity of paying a big ad firm to do cookie-cutter work. You have the advantage of not having any money. So you’ll probably end up ahead. — Mahesh Murthy is the Founder of digital brand-management firm Pinstorm and a venture capitalist at Seedfund. He tweets as @maheshmurthy. Indeed, the web search channel today is where brands live and die.

eb321848e3b.gif Establishing A Brand Image Online

Link:
Establishing A Brand Image Online